• politicalbaaba@gmail.com
  • March 25, 2014

India currently has too many political parties

India currently has 6 national parties (Congress, BJP, CPI, CPM, Bahujan Samaj Party and Nationalist Congress Party) and 52 recognized state / regional parties (prominently Samajwadi Party, Janata Dal (United), AIADMK, DMK, Biju Janata Dal, Akali Dal, Jharkhand Mukti Morcha, Rashtriya Lok Dal, National Conference, Telugu Desam Party, Trinamool Congress etc.). Plus there are hundreds of unrecognized parties. All of this results in a high number of candidates per constituency (~15 in 2009 Lok Sabha elections vs ~5 in 1st Lok Sabha elections). Among these candidates, some are serious, some non- serious, some propped up by one party to cut into votes of opposition party, some who stand on their own and threaten to cut votes in turn for a deal. Basically any Tom, Dick and Harry can stand up in elections.   Too many parties have brought in the era of unstable coalition politics A large number of candidates confuse the voters and leads to a chaos. National elections should be fought on national issues and presence of a number of state parties dilutes the main agenda. For state / local issues you anyways have state assembly elections.

Since 1989 Lok Sabha Elections, no single party has got majority and all governments have been coalition governments. This has led to a lot of instability. India has seen 9 Prime Ministers since 1989, out of which 5 have not lasted their full term. Even governments which have lasted full terms like Vajpayee, Manmohan Singh, Narasimha Rao have seen periods when allies have shown tantrums on bills proposed by their own supported governments.  The period also witnessed the decline in strength of Congress which in turn led to the emergence of strong regional satraps. Many of them have been offshoots of (i) the erstwhile Janata Dal (Mulayam’s SP, Ajit Singh’s RLD, Lalu’s RJD, Nitish’s JD(U), Patnaik’s BJD, Deve Gowda’s JD(S)) and (ii) Congress (Mamta’s TMC, Pawar’s NCP).

Regional Parties have no ideology & are hungry for power

These parties in most of the cases win seats fighting against Congress / BJP and after the elections join whichever combination has majority leading to horse-trading. They have no ideology & are hungry for power.  Few e.g. below:

– Ajit Singh was a Cabinet minister in Congress’s govt. in 1991 under N. Rao, NDA’s govt. in 1999 of Vajpayee and now recently joined UPA’s Manmohan govt. in 2012

– National Conference (Abdullahs) have been in NDA’s govt. in 1999 and now in UPA’s govt. of Manmohan since 2009

– Trinamool Congress (TMC) has been in NDA’s govt. of 1999 and UPA’s govt. of 2009. Recently pulled out

– Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM) supported Rao’s govt. in 1991, was with NDA govt. in 1999 and now with UPA govt. after jointly forming government in Jharkhand

– Karunanidhi’s DMK was in NDA’s govt. in 1999 and in UPA’s govt. in 2004 & 2009 before pulling its ministers recently

– Paswan’s Lok Janshakti Party (LJP) has been in NDA’s govt. in 1999 and also in UPA’s govt. in 2004, joined back NDA recently

– Sikkim Democratic Front has been in NDA’s govt. of 1999 as well as UPA’s govt. of 2004

– Nitish’s JD(U) was in NDA govt. in 1999, broke alliance with BJP recently, luring Congress for an alliance in 2014

How come these parties have supported both Congress & BJP governments who are ideology wise poles apart? Shows the ideological bankruptcy of these state parties!

What regional parties pray to god for?

Scenario I: There is a hung Parliament

  •   “Others” apart from two main combinations BJP & Congress get the maximum seats
  •   The subject state party gets the maximum number of seats in “others” category
  •   Congress / BJP are forced to do a Deve Gowda / Chandrasekhar formula to keep each other out
  •   This way leader of the state party with highest number of seats becomes the Prime Minister

Scenario II: There is a hung Parliament

  •   BJP or Congress whoever emerges as the single largest party can’t form government without them
  •   They in turn will bargain for maximum malai ministerial berths
  •   They will keep blackmailing the govt. throughout the tenure

Pity the intelligence of people who vote for regional parties in national elections

I am intrigued by the psyche of the voter who votes for a regional party candidate in Lok Sabha elections. There might be reasons like national parties have not put up good candidates. Then their decision is justified. But most of the time it is because they want their caste / state leader to become PM. Regional representation is also given as a reason. If a national party candidate wins will he not be representing the region? Deve Gowda episode has made all regional leaders day dream to become PM. Do voters of these parties ask their leaders what will they do if they don’t get majority on their own? Who will they support and why? Will they sit in opposition? If after elections regional party aligns with a national party, then the voter would have been better off giving vote directly to national party. Why go the indirect way?   

Electoral reforms the need of the hour

Currently to be a national party you have to be state party in 4 or more states. To be a state party you need >=6% of votes polled in the respective states. The definition of national party / state party also needs to change and it should be based on votes polled in Lok Sabha & State elections respectively. One suggestion could be that any party getting more than 5% of votes in Lok Sabha elections be called a national party. This is needed to get rid of instability at the center. This way you will not get a hung Parliament. A lot of countries have a 2/3 party system. Why can’t we?

Comments

best10

best10 2017-02-21 11:00:12/ Reply

Thank you ever so for you article.Really looking forward to read more.

kibris bahis siteleri

kibris bahis siteleri 2017-02-18 18:21:14/ Reply

Very neat article post. Really Cool.

Natural

Natural 2017-02-02 21:59:40/ Reply

Wow, great blog.Much thanks again.

http://100bestwhatsappstatus.com

http://100bestwhatsappstatus.com 2017-01-25 13:31:08/ Reply

I really liked your article post.

Ne pas tomber dans le piège des arnaques au faux prêt rapide

Ne pas tomber dans le piège des arnaques au faux prêt rapide 2017-01-23 20:57:50/ Reply

Thank you for your blog post.Much thanks again. Really Cool.

mp3 songs

mp3 songs 2017-01-18 14:40:01/ Reply

I value the article. Cool.

http://subwaysurfersgame.net

http://subwaysurfersgame.net 2017-01-12 04:44:25/ Reply

Enjoyed every bit of your article.Much thanks again. Want more.

diety zdrowe

diety zdrowe 2016-12-13 11:36:07/ Reply

Thanks a lot for the post. Keep writing.

eebest8 michael

eebest8 michael 2016-12-08 22:37:28/ Reply

"Every after in a when we decide on blogs that we study. Listed below are the most current web sites that we select"

my response

my response 2016-10-31 04:04:49/ Reply

I simply want to mention I'm newbie to weblog and absolutely savored you're web page. Almost certainly I’m planning to bookmark your blog post . You absolutely come with amazing article content. Many thanks for sharing your blog.

Tatvadnyan

Tatvadnyan 2014-04-16 22:13:03/ Reply

A related post about dealing with hung mandates resulting from multi-party fragmentation:

Electoral Reforms – The Need of The Hour | Politicalbaaba

Electoral Reforms – The Need of The Hour | Politicalbaaba 2014-03-29 19:59:15/ Reply

[…] My thoughts already published on “Should regional parties be allowed to contest national elections?” See link: http://politicalbaaba.wordpress.com/2014/03/25/should-regional-parties-be-allowed-to-contest-nationa… […]

Should Regional Parties be Banned from contesting National Elections | Yug Vani

Should Regional Parties be Banned from contesting National Elections | Yug Vani 2014-03-28 19:32:01/ Reply

[…] Should regional parties be allowed to contest national elections? […]

Politicalbaaba

Politicalbaaba 2014-03-27 21:40:36/ Reply

Thanks.I am not asking for curtailment of democratic right to fight. If people want to fight stand as independents. If someone is not comfortable with ideology of Congress or BJP fight as independent. Don't form parties and do politics. Don't fool your voters. Or other way could be to force state parties for a pre-poll alliance. I am an advocator of Presidential system of elections.

Politicalbaaba

Politicalbaaba 2014-03-26 09:07:25/ Reply

Reblogged this on Politicalbaaba.

desipoliticaljunkie

desipoliticaljunkie 2014-03-26 03:05:41/ Reply

The instability that results from a multiparty system such as the one we have today may cause a lot of heartburn and angst, but curtailing the democratic right of any party or individual to contest elections is not a reasonable solution. Like it or not, during Lok Sabha polls, we vote to elect an MP, not a PM. And to insist that one can only aspire to represent one's constituents in Parliament if one belongs to a "national party" is fundamentally unfair. If a candidate is not comfortable with the ideologies or the leadership of the Congress or the BJP, he should have other avenues open to present his platform to the public. Even countries that have two-party systems like the US or, to a lesser extent the UK (although the latter is not really a purely two party system anymore), have reached that point because of the natural evolution of the electorate's preferences, not because other parties are constitutionally forbidden. Indeed, some in the US lament the absence of a credible third alternative! In the context of India 2014, if there were a clearly defined, well organized third alternative front with a concise agenda, unambiguous manifesto and a declared leader, it would be more palatable and respectable alternative, and voters who favor the AIADMK, the BJD or the Trinamul would know what they are actually supporting at the national level. For the system to reach that level of maturity, voters need to become more savvy and demand clarity from their regional leaders, rather than accept expediency. But I don't think it can be imposed as a law by the Election Commission, for example. India needs regional parties that reflect regional aspirations. Should India have a presidential system then? That's a whole different debate. http://desipoliticaljunkie.wordpress.com

Politicalbaaba

Politicalbaaba 2014-03-25 13:32:26/ Reply

Thanks Dhru! Visit other sections of the blog also and give your valuable feedback too.

Politicalbaaba

Politicalbaaba 2014-03-25 13:31:28/ Reply

Thanks Vijay. Agree. They need to do a pre-poll alliance with national parties for Lok Sabha polls or not fight at all.

DHRUBANANDA BARIK (@DHRUBA1963)

DHRUBANANDA BARIK (@DHRUBA1963) 2014-03-25 12:05:54/ Reply

Political history says those parties bargains which is not good at all in the interest of states / nation. Those party should be banned for contesting LS election.Is not It just like a viral fever?

Vijay Tiwari

Vijay Tiwari 2014-03-25 11:15:05/ Reply

Typo....A big drain on Indian political system.....

Vijay Tiwari

Vijay Tiwari 2014-03-25 11:12:50/ Reply

There should be a complete ban on regional parties.....Only two national level parties should be allowed to contest.....Regional political parties are a big drain on Indian political parties..... Thank you.....

Post a Comment

MY BOOKS

BlogAdda Indian Elections Page

TOP 15 POLITICAL BLOGS IN INDIA

FaceBook Page

SITE STATISTICS

  • Total Visit: 2,322,994

MY BOOKS

Author Page

PB Speaks To The Guardian

PB Oye Times Interview

Follow me on Twitter

CONTACT US

politicalbaaba@gmail.com

Archives

FOLLOW THE BLOG